Delta CEO wants U.S. to put unruly passengers on 'no-fly' list

Re:Delta CEO wants U.S. to put unruly passengers on 'no-fly'... by kube-system on Saturday February 05, 2022 @02:52AM (#30218839)

Trespass law is not within DOTs regulatory purview. It is possible for a request from an airline to be legal under one set of laws but illegal under another. Airports are both under federal and state law. Which may conflict at times.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Delta CEO wants U.S. to put unruly passengers on 'no-fly'... by cuban-frisbee on Saturday February 05, 2022 @03:42AM (#30219134)

How could trespassing laws possibly apply? It’s not the airlines property just their vehicle parked on the government’s property

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Delta CEO wants U.S. to put unruly passengers on 'no-fly'... by amanaplanacanal on Saturday February 05, 2022 @07:19AM (#30220335)

By that logic a stranger could get into my car if it is parked in the street, since it is a private vehicle parked on the governments property. This seems counterintuitive.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Delta CEO wants U.S. to put unruly passengers on 'no-fly'... by cuban-frisbee on Saturday February 05, 2022 @01:55PM (#30224476)

But the vehicle is not parked in a public space it's parked on private property that is owned by the government. If someone is in a vehicle on someones property then it's the property owner not the vehicle owner were trespassing laws apply to.

The Airline is as much a guest in an airport as the passenger is.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Delta CEO wants U.S. to put unruly passengers on 'no-fly'... by kube-system on Saturday February 05, 2022 @04:23PM (#30226228)

This is not true. In the US, trespass in a vehicle is often criminalized regardless of where that vehicle sits.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Delta CEO wants U.S. to put unruly passengers on 'no-fly'... by kube-system on Saturday February 05, 2022 @11:58AM (#30223035)

Vehicles are typically included as property under most trespass laws

[ Parent | on HN ]