Re:What I'd like to see in Go 2.0
by bcrosby95 on Friday February 04, 2022 @01:45PM
(#30211134)
I guess I don't quite get this. What I'm seeing here is that a non obvious breaking change is being turned into an obvious one.
If something is handling A and B, but you add C, the code probably needs to make sure it's handling C correctly.
I use Java in my dayjob and the behavior you've outlined is how I always code things, but it's manual and doesn't happen at compile time: I provide default that throws a runtime exception.
If something is handling A and B, but you add C, the code probably needs to make sure it's handling C correctly.
I use Java in my dayjob and the behavior you've outlined is how I always code things, but it's manual and doesn't happen at compile time: I provide default that throws a runtime exception.