News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B by scarface74 on Friday February 04, 2022 @10:20AM (#30207853)
I have no problem with targeted ads based on what I specifically told Facebook. It’s when I’m shopping on Amazon and see the same products advertised on FB that there is a problem.
Re:Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B by danudey on Friday February 04, 2022 @04:00PM (#30213124)
For the longest time I was getting Amazon ads on Instagram that were for products I had recently viewed - even viewed less than an hour before in some cases. Moreover, the Amazon account we use is my wife's, which we pay for Prime on. I would look at something on my phone, which is logged into her account, and then see the ad show up in my Instagram feed that day or a few days later.

Now, I get 90% ads for car parts and car accessories. I don't have a car, I don't drive, I don't have a license, and I don't even like to be in a car, but for whatever reason Amazon (or Instagram?) ads are assuming that what I really want are car parts and car accessories that I don't recognize, can't use, or don't understand.

It feels very stupid to me that those are the "default" ads I'm getting, even though I never tap on them for obvious reasons, but it's reassuring to know that they went from knowing exactly who I am and specifically what I had been looking at to having no clue whatsoever anything about me, or who I am or what I like.

Re:Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B by GekkePrutser on Saturday February 05, 2022 @03:18AM (#30218965)
No, this is when you notice there's a problem, that you're being tracked.

The problem is the tracking itself, whether you notice it or not. At least that's my opinion.

Re:Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B by scarface74 on Saturday February 05, 2022 @08:20AM (#30220711)
People set up their profile and they basically tell them everything about themselves.

Just like I doubt that people mind that Netflix gives you recommendations based on what you watched on Netflix.