News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:People don't want to run their own bank by falcolas on Friday February 04, 2022 @10:11AM (#30207697)
> For example, charges to send payments internationally are often vastly more expensive than the actual cost to the banks

I think you can attribute that one to capitalism, not collusion. Profits are important for banks. It's a rare for-profit institution provides services at cost.

Any entity can join the "send money internationally cartel", but they have to adhere to the laws in both countries. This is a loophole that cryptocurrencies are bypassing today, but I expect the law to catch up in this area, and it won't be pretty.

Re:People don't want to run their own bank by rlpb on Friday February 04, 2022 @11:16AM (#30208727)
> It's a rare for-profit institution provides services at cost.

In a healthy market, competition forces down the price of services approach such that they approach cost. A large profit margin can indicate a free market failure, such as a barrier to entry.

(it may also represent some kind of necessary capital investment for entry, but I don't think that's the case here)

Re:People don't want to run their own bank by falcolas on Friday February 04, 2022 @11:51AM (#30209254)
> it may also represent some kind of necessary capital investment for entry, but I don't think that's the case here

Discounting laws, registrations, offices, staff, etc., you would still have to distribute sufficient capital between nations to provide for the transfer of money before the actual money itself can be transferred.

The shifting of money between entities within a single country can take several days, and most international money transfers are expected to happen in hours, not weeks. It's a low risk loan - given from one branch of your own company to another - but you still have to have the money to loan out.