News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B by alexashka on Friday February 04, 2022 @09:17AM (#30206994)
No.

You can't have a democracy with 100 IQ idiot majority, because their decisions are governed by whatever gets poured into their poorly working brains that week, so you end up with corporatocracy or fascism, pretending to be a democracy.

Re:Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B by Jasper_ on Friday February 04, 2022 @10:47AM (#30208279)
I know this isn't the point, but you do realize that the IQ is rearranged to fit a bell curve with 100 being the exact middle average, right? By literally the definition of IQ, 100 IQ is not "an idiot".
Re:Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B by colinmhayes on Friday February 04, 2022 @11:27AM (#30208908)
I think the point is that the average person is an idiot.
Re:Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B by sfe22 on Friday February 04, 2022 @09:21AM (#30207031)
Then we need to fix the apparent problem of idiot majority. If you say most people are stupid why would you want them to vote every 4 years. Can you trust their vote? Do you still advocate for the current form of “democracy”? Maybe we should go back to monarchy and have only one glorious ruler rather than one glorious government.
Re:Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B by alexashka on Friday February 04, 2022 @09:56AM (#30207497)
You can fix most people, or you can just abandon one idea because it's incompatible with how most people are.

Tough choice, but I think I'll opt in for the latter.

Uh! Oh! But if not democracy, then what? Then fascism and corporatocracy - what we have had for as long as you've been alive. You just don't know it :)

Re:Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B by sfe22 on Friday February 04, 2022 @10:23AM (#30207899)
Your reply is confusing. So you maintain that most people are stupid, and still want to give them voting rights. What is the logic behind that? To clarify, I don’t think most people are stupid, and I advocate for direct democracy.