News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Non-Consensual Personalization by SideburnsOfDoom on Friday February 04, 2022 @04:12AM (#30204522)
> Imagine if cars came in a kit and I could assemble it and choose the fittings myself ... man, that'd be great.

I mean, for a niche certain audience, yes it is great.

But for mass market, people don't necessarily want to take on a whole new hobby in order to experience the thing.

Worse, it's contextual within the same individual: the person who wants to customise the car doesn't want to make their own sourdough pizza from type-00 flour, and customised web browser. And vice versa: each thinks "why waste time on that other thing"?

Re:Non-Consensual Personalization by axiomsEnd on Friday February 04, 2022 @05:51AM (#30205202)
Instant messaging in 200x was based on "naked content" that could be parsed by anyone, so there was a lot of different programs supporting various forms of communications. If you weren't a programmer you simply relied on 3rd-party software and that worked quite nicely.
Re:Non-Consensual Personalization by SideburnsOfDoom on Friday February 04, 2022 @06:34AM (#30205501)
Exactly. likewise most people go to a dealer and get a "third party car" that works quite nicely on the shared infrastructure of roads, signs, gas stations etc. Maybe with a few configurable options such as color.
Re:Non-Consensual Personalization by lnenad on Friday February 04, 2022 @12:32PM (#30209839)
And then there was non enthusiast software and it won, so I guess that's what the people want.