Re:Web3 is not going to change the world
by cle on Thursday February 03, 2022 @09:39AM
(#30192959)
Of course, but the useful property is that it could be anywhere.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Web3 is not going to change the world
by cuddlecake on Thursday February 03, 2022 @11:22AM
(#30194387)
But over long enough time it _must_ be somewhere where somebody can provide Computational power and
evergrowing storage capacity, right?
So.. not anywhere.
Or can the data be available in a highly fragmented fashion _and_ still be useful? I just can't imagine any content system that does not end up being centralized or highly inconvenient.
If someone cares about a piece of content's availability on IPFS, they can host it and anyone in the network can pull it from them without having to know a priori that they provide the content. That's what I mean by "anywhere". Anyone can provide any content they want, from anywhere, on whatever infrastructure they want, as long as there's a communication channel open with the rest of the network.
If you care about high availability of a piece of content, you will dedicate infrastructure to hosting it on IPFS, just like you would on the Internet.
Re:Web3 is not going to change the world
by cuddlecake on Thursday February 03, 2022 @01:24PM
(#30196421)
Is there any need for the Blockchain for that? Like... Setup a server and host the content. I can't imagine it being simpler than that.
Why would I engage in the dance of crypto just to host some content no one will read anyway?
What's IPFS?
IPFS doesn't use a blockchain nor crypto. Conceptually the Internet is a set of protocols that together map (data-identifier, provider) -> bytes (e.g. GET https://<provider>/<data-identifier>). Similarly IPFS is a set of protocols that map (data-identifier) -> bytes.