News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Settings are not a design failure by rapind on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @08:49PM (#30187339)
Yes, I think it really depends on what the software does and what I'm using it for (my willingness to invest time).

If it's something I use every day for years on end to make a living, then I probably want to be able to tweak and customize it (and I won't mind doing it). Just don't make me keep doing it because your evergreen software keeps updating and changing how things work.

If it's something I "barely" use, then I have absolutely no interest in customizing it. It should just work.

For example, if all I want to do is securely share a file with someone, then don't make me jump through hoops to use it. If however I was looking for software that let me share organized groups of files, should sort in a specific way, would expire after a certain amount of time, and to track engagement with these files (downloads / views), then are probably a few settings I will want to tweak.

What I think often happens is software will evolve / pivot to do more (maybe sometimes less?) then it was originally designed to do. Unfortunately that evolution some times lacks a different design perspective. You might have been religious about clean and simple in the original product, but now it's a bit more nuanced, and you'll need to be more flexible. I don't think there's an easy solution. We just need to recognize that as features are added, design still needs to be part of that process.

There are no comments on this comment yet.