Re:Over-reliance on CGI in movies
by theshrike79 on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @03:09PM
(#30183273)
It's called "The Volume" and it's a true game-changer.
Because the environment projects its own lights, reflections are automatically correct and don't need to be added in post. It also gives huge freedom to the DP for shots because they don't really have to light anything specifically.
And the best thing is that it's comparatively cheap so they can punch way over their budget effects-wise.
To be fair, the volume looks extremely goofy if you're there. The perspective shifts with the camera, and apparently can be close to nauseating if the camera moves too fast, and doesn't feel like a holodeck but instead a room covered in screens. It's game changing for being able to integrate vfx, but it's arguably more distracting for actors than a green screen.
Does that mean they have to do a take per camera? Or have every shot pre planned rather than editing them together I suppose.
I do think CGI is often overutilized, much to the detriment of many shows and films, especially in genres where practical effects get the job done (i.e. - not sci-fi). However, these techniques are evolving, and the actors can at least start to see visual cues and interact with the same digital elements that the viewer will ultimately be shown.