Re:GDPR enforcer rules that IAB Europe’s consent popups are ...
by pelorat on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @12:21PM
(#30180643)
> So I can murder someone, and say "Innocent until proven guilty", and forbid anyone from discussing whether I'm a murderer, until I'm actually judged guilty?
In many European countries it's in fact against the law to publish the name of a suspect until a court has found them guilty. And is some it's even illegal to publish the name at all.
Re:GDPR enforcer rules that IAB Europe’s consent popups are ...
by msla on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @11:16AM
(#30179582)
That's not what I said. I said that it would presumably require a trial to prove that the ML models contain PII, as opposed to the government being able to assume they do and demanding the company prove they don't to some arbitrary standard.
So I can murder someone, and say "Innocent until proven guilty", and forbid anyone from discussing whether I'm a murderer, until I'm actually judged guilty?
But ok, sounds like you're nitpicking on my words, so let me rephrase the comment you're replying to.
"Considering that we have dozens of research papers showing that public models contain PII, how can we trust that FAANG's private models doesn't without auditing? It sounds safe to assume it does contain PII"