News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A toy DNS resolver by Groxx on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @10:21PM (#30173270)
That's describing how a cache hit stops the cycle, not how a cache miss doesn't encounter one.
Re:A toy DNS resolver by atomicnumber3 on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @12:38AM (#30174152)
The standards tell you specifically to handle not going into infinite resolving loops and such.
Re:A toy DNS resolver by Groxx on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @02:25PM (#30182678)
So "Q: how do you handle resolver loops?" is "A: you handle them."?

I mean, probably true and accurate for many things. But if so that's not really a standard for how to handle it. It just means that, to be compliant, you need to figure it out and doing something about it.

Re:A toy DNS resolver by tptacek on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @11:11PM (#30173622)
It's why a cycle doesn't just DOS the server.
Re:A toy DNS resolver by Groxx on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @12:03AM (#30173932)
Er. Not with that explanation. The cache won't be hit until a result is found, instead each request produces another request back to through the cycle to try to get that request. Hence DoS.