> What I believe the original comment meant is when a journalist is killed, at least we should attempt to include specific information about the journalist's recent articles and investigated topics in articles about a journalist's death.

“We” who? Especially for ongoing investigations, the only people who have that information are employers/coworkers who are likely also known to (and often explicitly under threat from) the same actors.

It's easy as a reader to say to them that “we” should share this information, but it’s not really a “we” that you are part of.