News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The New York Times buys Wordle by RC_ITR on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @03:39AM (#30160035)
Ok I’m ignorant. Why only 5 letters?

Also one could argue the root cause of those many, complex reasons is under-investment in R&D based in the assumption “the current product is perfect”

Re:The New York Times buys Wordle by tehbeard on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @06:42AM (#30161278)
Timing for the game loop and accessibility.

5 letters gives enough options without requiring the player to have access to a lot of guesses to have any hope of winning, and gives the game a short playtime.

It's built to be quick to play. You can play it on a commute, or dip in a few times throughout the day.

You wouldn't have that progress visible to players with a larger problem space. Tangentially, you'd also wind up having to lean more on "technical" (as in scoped to a particular domain, not technological) language in order to fill the list. That limits access to those outside of that field of study.

Re:The New York Times buys Wordle by RC_ITR on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @11:44AM (#30165195)
You’re just describing positive aspects of the game in its current state, not “anything other than 5 letters causes the game to fall apart”