News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sony to buy video game maker Bungie in $3.6B deal by evrydayhustling on Monday January 31, 2022 @02:48PM (#30153248)
If you allocate all those hours to one gamer, there's no contest. Check out the dev costs of games here [1] to the "net negative" (no marketing) costs for movies here [2] -- 4 games break $100M while you need $200M as a movie to get on the list. So, twice as much for 2h of content!

But if you factor in audience size, things get more complicated. Red Dead 2 sold about 38M copies, a near record, but Avengers Endgame reached something like 250-300M people at the box office, even before streaming etc.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_video_g... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_films

Re:Sony to buy video game maker Bungie in $3.6B deal by Someone on Monday January 31, 2022 @06:01PM (#30156022)
I think the OP's argument is that you also have to factor in hours played, and that, per player-hour, respectively movie-watcher-hour, the game is a lot cheaper.

300M movie watchers is about half a billion hours. If those 38M games all had only one player (probably fairly close) they only have to play the game for 15 hours on average to get at half a billion player hours.

https://howlongtobeat.com/game?id=27100 claims it takes at least 49 hours to beat it, so it’s likely that the game was played for more hours than the movie was watched.

Re:Sony to buy video game maker Bungie in $3.6B deal by JulianK on Monday January 31, 2022 @08:46PM (#30157597)
As an added layer I suspect that most people watch the entire movie but most people don't finish games.

There's a percentage of players of course that will play a game for many hundreds or thousands of hours but the calculation is shakier when you take the falloff of players into account/

https://www.ign.com/articles/2014/03/17/gdc-most-players-don...

Re:Sony to buy video game maker Bungie in $3.6B deal by tsimionescu on Monday January 31, 2022 @03:43PM (#30154008)
Isn't a huge part of that money going to the actors, not into more typical actual labor?

Games take a lot longer to produce than films (in total, per hour of content that may not be true).

Re:Sony to buy video game maker Bungie in $3.6B deal by toyg on Monday January 31, 2022 @05:49PM (#30155862)
Not that huge, really. A-list actors will get 10-20m tops, add all the others and you're probably looking at around 30m-40m over a budget of 300m-500m.

The largest expenses are related to FX costs and marketing. That's why the cost of low-effects movies falls very rapidly under 100m, you can film a run-of-the-mill romcom for less than 10m.