Funny thing about that is he always says that he is the only one speaking up because everyone else has incentives (gets payed) to shut-up. Imagine that, a pandemic breaks out, you invent the cure and get nothing in return. I would want to burn down the world.

> who was part of the team who invented RNA-based vaccines.

Yeah, no: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w

Thanks, this article confirms indeed that Dr. Malone is one the 50 or so people in the world, who has the highest legitimacy speaking of that topic.

It says he discovered a way to put mRNA into human cells. We don't even know that, really - we know he ran an experiment doing so.

It does not say he knows anything about the things he talked about on JRE: hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, or anything about the specific mRNA being delivered to fight COVID (unless you are suggesting that ALL mRNA insertions kill people), or anything about immunity at all, or anything about Israel/Palestine, or anything about epidemics, or anything about monoclonal antibodies, or anything about mass formation psychosis (except to the extent he is trying to make it happen).

I have a proposal to make things easier: why don't you and your friends give us a list of people allowed to talk about ivermectine, or mRNA, or Israel/Palestine, so we can more easily put them all on one channel that will give us the Truth and make it easier to protect us from all of the other articles, podcasts, etc ? I've seen some regimes do that and it works much better.

Here is the list of things you are not allowed to talk about:

1. Things that are false, whose dissemination regardless creates significant harm to society.

When you say false, are you using binary or ternary logic?

Would you be interested in acquiring an ownership interest in the Danyang–Kunshan Grand Bridge?

Is this comment satire? Robert Malone is the person Joe Rogan interviewed, and that everyone is up at arms about. He is literally the first name that appears in the first sentence of that article you linked.

> He is literally the first name that appears in the first sentence of that article you linked.

Right, because there is no way a 5000 word article could in anyway clarify or add context to a specific claim once it mentions a name.