Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Leaked IP Address in Van Nuys, CA, Frequ...
by sahil50 on Monday January 31, 2022 @01:44AM
(#30145256)
For newcomers to this thread, reread my posts, and if you have open-ended questions, I'd be willing to answer.
Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Leaked IP Address in Van Nuys, CA, Frequ...
by smoldesu on Monday January 31, 2022 @11:40AM
(#30149966)
That's a strange way to concede but I'll take it.
Re:Satoshi Nakamoto Leaked IP Address in Van Nuys, CA, Frequ...
by throwaway29303 on Monday January 31, 2022 @12:57PM
(#30151384)
I don't think his point is to argue what's true. More like that he wants exposure for this idea that Elon is Satoshi. I'm still struggling to understand why this is a thing right now.
Your second point, that SpaceX and Tesla are priorities for him, also makes no sense. Bitcoin is entirely autonomous, if he announced and proved that he designed the Bitcoin protocol, very little would change vis-a-vis his own responsibilities. In fact, if he was able to prove that he was Satoshi, he almost certainly would have done so before selling billions of dollars in his own stocks last November. To insist otherwise would be to accuse Musk of pissing his own corporate value down the drain, which everyone knows is the last thing he'd do.
Furthermore, I don't even know what you mean by "sufficient public will" here. If Musk wanted the public to universally acknowledge him as Satoshi, as I stated, there are several ways that he could prove his unequivocal authorship of the Bitcoin code. Your "extraordinarily specific commonalities" are that he knows one of the most popular programming languages in the world and lives on the west coast. That's not extraordinary or specific at all. You're basing your entire argument off of a few coincidences that could apply to hundreds if not thousands of people, and you're simply choosing the most popular person who fits the description.
Elon Musk had every opportunity to step forward, and he still admits that he had nothing to do with the creation of Bitcoin. Insisting otherwise is a waste of time and credibility, as I'm sure other people will remind you of if you continue to espouse this theory that is undeniably deranged.