Reclaiming the lost art of Linux server administration

Re:Reclaiming the lost art of Linux server administration by 2Gkashmiri on Saturday January 29, 2022 @03:09AM (#30124681)

curious that the souce metions MIT license at top but in the bottom it says "2. Don't use our resources for closed source projects";

was that intentional? my current understanding of MIT license is a "do anything, i don't care, just don't blame me".

if i were you and wanted to use "dont use our resources" part, i would set it as AGPL or even SSPL if you are brave enough.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reclaiming the lost art of Linux server administration by e-dt on Saturday January 29, 2022 @04:13AM (#30124958)

There's a difference between what you are allowed to do with the code, which is what the MIT license covers, and what you are allowed to do with a specific hosted platform on which the code is running, which is what that term is part of.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reclaiming the lost art of Linux server administration by 2Gkashmiri on Saturday January 29, 2022 @05:24AM (#30125271)

oh. Do... you need to specify another license for that? this is interesting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reclaiming the lost art of Linux server administration by DarylZero on Saturday January 29, 2022 @08:23AM (#30126070)

It's not a license, it's rule #2, where "This _network_ has three rules: [...]"

[ Parent | on HN ]