News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on On the Term “Blameless Postmortem”. Parent comment

Re:On the Term “Blameless Postmortem” by kwooding on Friday January 28, 2022 @06:40PM (#30122046)
In any live event, things go wrong. Tearing in to what went well, what didn’t go well, and suggesting process changes for the next event is an important process not only for making future events easier, but also for improving the mental Health of the organizers who tend to focus on the “what went wrong” parts.

So technically, we only hold one if things went wrong.

If we ever held an event where everything went right, then yes, we’d totally call that one an afterparty.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On the Term “Blameless Postmortem” by justsomehnguy on Monday January 31, 2022 @02:17PM (#30152737)
Yes,

> Tearing in to what went well, what didn’t go well, and suggesting process changes for the next event

is the regular [performance|postfactum|event] analysis, but it IS NOT the postmortem!

From your previous comment you understand what the term means "after death". Did you really think "after death" and "after event" are the same?

[ Parent | on HN ]