Re:Ask HN: Why is there no high quality method for voice con...
by sapiol on Saturday January 29, 2022 @03:39PM
(#30130167)
Offtopic:
Hi, I saw your comments in some older thread about chelation (Cutler Protocol).
I too am from germany and have some questions about your chelation protocol.
Unfortunately, I can't reply anymore on that other thread.
Can you contact me at [email protected] ?
Re:Ask HN: Why is there no high quality method for voice con...
by sapiol on Saturday January 29, 2022 @05:54PM
(#30131440)
Offtopic: Hi, again. That didn't work as there is a 30m time-limit on byom.de. Can you please contact me again, but this time here:
[email protected]
Re:Ask HN: Why is there no high quality method for voice con...
by nosianu on Sunday January 30, 2022 @01:49PM
(#30139881)
Just get a regular account instead of those public services. Some random name at gmx.de for example. With the "d-" mail never appears, without it it works but the mail body was "undefined" when I checked what that service showed. I deleted it again.
I also have such a throwaway-but-real account in my "About" under my user name here, just added it. Should have done that anyway, you just reminded me that I should.
For detailed work though the more direct method of translating movements is far more efficient.
When you can describe an abstract end goal voice is great. When you have to actually do all the individual steps towards some high level goal then it's like telling a newbie programmer through some high level database optimization. You only use voice because your main goal here is to teach someone. If the PC could be taught that way, then voice would be in demand for such tasks too.