Re:Sweden approves plan to bury spent nuclear fuel for 100k ...
by ch4s3 on Thursday January 27, 2022 @02:15PM
(#30104823)
Yeah, water is a very good radiation shield, and seafloor gunk doesn't hurt. The concrete casks probably sink pretty easily too.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sweden approves plan to bury spent nuclear fuel for 100k ...
by KarlKemp on Thursday January 27, 2022 @03:09PM
(#30105714)
Also, salty seawater will eat through any metal at about the rate of a Windows 95 install process indicator. At that point, the nuclear gunk will disperse in the water, enter the food chain, and soon be part of your romantic lobster dinner. Enjoy!
Re:Sweden approves plan to bury spent nuclear fuel for 100k ...
by ch4s3 on Thursday January 27, 2022 @03:33PM
(#30106153)
The casks aren't metal on the outside, they're a specialized concrete. These casks have been dropped from building, exploded, struck by speeding trains, and burned at incredibly high temp all without losing integrity. Even still, uranium and similar waste products aren't water soluble and being more dense than any surrounding material so they would sink through the sediment and become locked in place. Here's a really old survey on the topic[1]. Here's another study [2]. Basically most of the waste would be short-lived beta and gamma emitters that are no longer dangerous after a few years. The longer lived alpha emitters aren't dangerous because alpha particles are easily stopped. You can safely hold a small amount of uranium in you hand.
With respect to ocean life, there is also very little life in these trenches, and what life there is doesn't mix with food chains at higher levels. All of the food comes from biological material sinking, and nothing really goes the other direction.
[1] https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/31404684750.pdf [2] https://www.swr.de/-/id=13132940/property=download/nid=23345...
Re:Sweden approves plan to bury spent nuclear fuel for 100k ...
by a9h74j on Thursday January 27, 2022 @04:45PM
(#30107183)
Also, last time I estimated Bequerels (aka decays) in the ocean already, compared to what extremely dilute waste would add, well as I recall it was "a drop in the ocean."
Need to recheck this sometime.