News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Anti-vaxxers making ‘at least $2.5m’ a year from publishing on Substack. Parent comment

Re:Anti-vaxxers making ‘at least $2.5m’ a year from publishi... by lkrubner on Thursday January 27, 2022 @10:38AM (#30101808)
> How would it be decided? Who would decide it?

In this case, it is up to Substack to decide. The reason for bringing pressure against Substack is exactly so that they remove the disinformation that is harmful to the public.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Anti-vaxxers making ‘at least $2.5m’ a year from publishi... by brigandish on Thursday January 27, 2022 @07:41PM (#30109244)
“To remove information that some disagree with” would be easier to achieve if it’s termed “(to) remove the disinformation that is harmful to the public”.

So who decides what is disinformation? And why didn’t the Guardian provide any disinformation? (in the example about Malone they used, Malone’s claim was correct)

[ Parent | on HN ]