News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Alder Lake Core i9 processor is faster than the M1 Max by moonchild on Thursday January 27, 2022 @04:21AM (#30098157)
> Decoders on Arm are definitely parallel (= don't have more serial logic for wider decoder) compared to the variable length decode x86 is stuck with

x86 decode is parallel too

Re:Alder Lake Core i9 processor is faster than the M1 Max by e4e78a06 on Thursday January 27, 2022 @11:54AM (#30102887)
It is parallel in the sense that you can decode 4-6 instructions in parallel, yes. It is not parallel in the sense that variable length decoding requires each of your decoders to talk to the other ones to coordinate on instruction length boundaries, which means there is going to be a lot of serial logic in your decoder circuit.
Re:Alder Lake Core i9 processor is faster than the M1 Max by throwawaylinux on Thursday January 27, 2022 @05:46PM (#30108098)
It doesn't, if your L1$ predecodes at fill time and stores instruction length.

Something, somewhere does have to do a serial length decoding of course. But when you look at the L2 access latency and throughput (which is the minimum L1 fill latency), it's clear you could afford to do that part of the decode over more cycles.

New designs are not just predecoding lengths but entire uops now into the first level instruction cache which is the same concept they just call it a L0 and L1 rather than L1 and L2.