There's a distinction worth making between voyeurism and sexualizing others but when someone portrays themselves as they want to be seen I have no idea why that needs to be put in some sort of box. Because there ought to be nothing offensive about sex, which is just about the most natural thing on earth.
And of course for some reason everything is assumed to be sexualized, from a sculpture of a torso to even breastfeeding mothers, I still remember 'female presenting nipples' on what was it, tumblr? It's like some sort of cursed feedback loop where the repression leads people to be horny about every sight of a nipple.
Have you seen other cultures? US culture is one of the LEAST repressed cultures.
Worldwide I’d put the US just on the conservative Side of the middle line regarding sexuality.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-95129...
But if says there's more prepressed than Puritan.
I disagree. Yes it's multicultural; but there are unified attitudes and cultural behaviors that purvey the country. Foreigners who come from abroad to live here maintain their own cultural identity while adopting American culture.
What do you mean by strong cultural weight? You mean like Japan or China?
China has no cultural weight on English speaking countries.
This thread is a goldmine of the most politically correct ways to say "the middle east doesn't count"
This isn't the same as Turkey, but their cultural weight does not impact English speaking countries.
I would also probably feel offended if Google told me that my breasts are pornographic just because of their size.
I think it’s kind of like when you read “public is outraged” and in reality there’re three people writing angry tweets.
I wouldn't jump the gun on allowing sexualization everywhere since it can have pretty bad effects on some people.
Now whether this is sexual or not is another matter.