News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Systemd by Example. Parent comment

Re:Systemd by Example by morganvachon on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @10:53AM (#30086992)
No, I'm not. I'm satisfying the other person's request for sources with examples I've come across in the past. In this case it was not about cgroup-less kernels but about Poettering's and Sievers' attitudes towards fixing the issue.

This is why I don't like to talk about systemd on any internet forum; it always leads to people like you ready to attack any position around the subject, and me having to defend a position I don't even hold (I don't think systemd sucks, I think its developers could do better though). I am done with this thread.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Systemd by Example by throwawaysysd on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @11:40AM (#30087744)
I'm not attacking you or asking you to defend a position, I'm asking for clarification because I legitimately do not understand what the issue is. I totally agree with you, it is not helping anyone to become defensive over this. I don't understand what the attitude was, it seems to have been fixed 8 years ago? Did I miss something?
[ Parent | on HN ]