Re:Agatha Christie could afford a maid and a nanny but not a...
by thaumasiotes on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @12:03AM
(#30081952)
The £200 of passive income presumably came from a stock of wealth. And the passive income by itself was still 6 times the salary of the live-in maid. The stock of wealth should therefore have been valued similarly to six healthy female slaves. (Give or take some adjustments, but broadly similar.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Agatha Christie could afford a maid and a nanny but not a...
by nicoburns on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @11:22AM
(#30087451)
> The £200 of passive income presumably came from a stock of wealth
Given we're talking about Agatha Christie here, I imagine the £200 of passive income came from book sales.
Re:Agatha Christie could afford a maid and a nanny but not a...
by binarybits on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @12:25PM
(#30088489)
No, this was before she became a successful author. About half of it was an inheritance on her side. The other half came from his side.