Where is the evidence for this? Everything I've seen suggests 10-20% of vaccine-induced myocarditis cases result in a life-lasting disability.
It's much, much more likely that reaction to the vaccine is uncovering existing, latent myocarditis than it is causing them. A la https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle_windshield_pitting_epi...
Also, nobody who cares about myocarditis seems to be pointing out that you are 16x more likely to get a myocarditis diagnosis from catching Covid than you are for getting vaccinated.
https://www.onlinejcf.com/article/S1071-9164(18)30491-3/full... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786665/ https://jitc.bmj.com/content/7/1/53
It seems pretty safe to assume that if you have an autoimmune disorder that causes heart inflammation when attacking a virus, in some people it may respond to the vaccine similarly. (But again, I think the evidence in such cases is that your body would be much more responsive to a covid infection than an mrna vaccine).
The reason myocarditis is underreported is because most cases are incredibly mild. So if you have a choice between a disease you have a 45% chance of catching and a 1% chance of dying of, or a vaccine with a 1 in 10,000 chance of having an adverse reaction to, with a 1 in 20,000 chance that it would be fatal, which would you rather choose?
9 billion doses have been given out! If there were serious safety concerns with vaccines, I would personally know people affected.
Of course you are incredibly unlucky if you are one of the 3000 people in the US who are seriously affected by a vaccine, but people telling me my winning lottery ticket is fake isn't an example of oppression - you want a doctor who doesn't jump to weird edge cases at first chance.
It's not that these people "don't understand the science", it's that they don't understand probability.