News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend by bryanlarsen on Friday September 16, 2011 @02:56PM (#3005773)
If vultures are descending, I would think it would be better to wait. The bidding war will temporarily bump up your stock price & options, giving you a better time to sell them. Then the vultures will offer buy-outs to encourage employees to leave. I doubt the vultures will be overly generous in their buy-outs but it can still amount to a substantial amount of cash if you've been there a while.
Re:Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend by jmathai on Friday September 16, 2011 @03:39PM (#3005969)
Most people's stock options are so underwater they're eternally worthless. An increase of a few bucks in the stock price isn't worth the cost on your morale.
Re:Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend by linguaphobe on Friday September 16, 2011 @08:41PM (#3006874)
How's your open-source Flickr coming along, man?

// sorry, using a throw-away account..

Re:Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend by yangtheman on Friday September 16, 2011 @03:25PM (#3005896)
Why buy-outs? If I were looking for cutting costs, I would just lay them off.
Re:Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend by chollida1 on Friday September 16, 2011 @04:22PM (#3006155)
I'm not the parent you responded to, but I'm assuming when they said buy-outs, they were including severance for layoffs.

In North America 1 month is pretty common if you've been with a company for more than a year with 2 months not being uncommon.

I've heard of people being given 1 month of notice of a layoff and then being asked to work that month only once:)

Re:Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend by tomkarlo on Friday September 16, 2011 @05:05PM (#3006310)
1 month is common because companies care about their public image when it comes to hiring new people, and they know that the remaining employees will watch how those being cut are treated. If you've got new folks in charge who don't care about it, or need to cut cash outlay _very_ fast because they levered up the company to buy it, you may not get that severance. There's certainly no legal obligation to give a month of severance when it comes to an "at will" employee.

I've been around at a few companies before where cuts happened. The first round of layoffs always got good severance, because the company wanted to make sure that the remaining employees didn't bail... but after 2 or 3 rounds, the jig was up, so the severance shrank from 2-3 months to 2-3 weeks.

Re:Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend by chollida1 on Friday September 16, 2011 @06:19PM (#3006552)
> There's certainly no legal obligation to give a month of severance when it comes to an "at will" employee.

I see, this is news to me.

I'm Canadian so I guess the laws can certainly be different, but I was under the impression that 2 weeks was a minimum severance required by law.

I've never seen less than a month, I guess this could be enforced by employment contracts. I know it's been in every one I've signed:)

Re:Yahoo employees: Get out now before the vultures descend by tomkarlo on Friday September 16, 2011 @11:21PM (#3007143)
There's no minimum severance (at least at the national level), as far as I know. (http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/wages/severancepay.htm) ... In theory it could be in your contract, but I personally can't recall ever seeing a contract that had such a clause. The standard is "at will" - if you come in to work one day and they don't need you any more, that's it, just the same as you don't really have to give two weeks notice when you leave (but most people do for the sake of the relationship.)