> People often use arguments like “but it’s not statistically significant” to try to discount results. I even hear people with PhDs or MDs say this, because somewhere in their schooling they were falsely taught that results need to be “statistically significant” to be “real.”

Ok I stopped reading halfway through.

How did this garbage obvious misinformation make it to the front page?

Well thought out blog post that made me think. Not your typical antivac microchip stuff at all.

Countdown until it gets flagged activated

I am a little worried about that. Rather than having a logical discussion about vaccines, there is a push to simply imprison people who question (https://katv.com/news/nation-world/half-of-dems-believe-fine...). Hopefully we can rise above the FUD here.

And there goes that chance. @dang, why was this banned?