Re:Quarto: A scientific and technical publishing system buil...
by acenes on Monday January 24, 2022 @02:02AM
(#30054431)
So, why should one use the next generation? Because it is not tied to R or Python? We're all using one or the other so that doesn't sound like a convincing reason to completely change my workflow.
Re:Quarto: A scientific and technical publishing system buil...
by jjallr on Monday January 24, 2022 @07:23AM
(#30056777)
I think if you are happy with the workflow/output you have there is no reason at all to change. w/r/t to websites and books we have put a lot of investment into features for both (https://quarto.org/docs/websites/, https://quarto.org/docs/books/). If you compare books with Bookdown vs. Quarto vs. JupyterBook I think you'll find that each does some things better than the others (so again if you are happy w/ your existing tools no reason to change).
Re:Quarto: A scientific and technical publishing system buil...
by acenes on Wednesday February 02, 2022 @12:36AM
(#30174137)
Thanks for the response. Is there any plan for Quarto to support live code, e.g. the reader can change the code and update the output? Or a feature that makes it easy to have a comment section for each page? I think these things are either not supported or not trivial to do with Bookdown or JupyterBook.
So, it is the next generation of that.