News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Myths about cooking steak that need to go away (2013) by tptacek on Saturday January 22, 2022 @06:30PM (#30041922)
Not really. You have the same problem either way, because you've gotta sear both steaks. If you're going to need to hold the cooked reverse-sear steaks, bring them up to 120-124 (your final target temp is 128-132) instead of 115.

I get what you're saying (I've got like 4 different circulators here, I'm not against them!) but the reverse sear is forgiving and flexible enough that I don't really even get a convenience win from it.

(For calibration: my modal steak is a Whole Foods ribeye or strip, unmodified except for being salted ahead of time).

Re:Myths about cooking steak that need to go away (2013) by JshWright on Saturday January 22, 2022 @07:56PM (#30042564)
For me the convenience factor has to do with the fact that I can vacuum seal and freeze a bunch of meat at once, then it's just a matter of tossing the vacuum sealed bag in the circulator a few hours before dinner. Then I just need to pull it out, hit it with the torch, and we're ready to eat. I suspect the longer cooking time to account for the meant being frozen helps with fat rendering.

We buy half a beef every six months or so (split with my parents, so I guess it's technically 5/7th's of a half? 5/14th's of a cow?). For a few hours on a weekend doing some prep/portioning, I can dramatically reduce the workload for several week's worth of meals.

Obviously there's other tradeoffs involved and different personal circumstances to consider, but for me the circulator wins out from a convenience perspective.

Re:Myths about cooking steak that need to go away (2013) by fisherjeff on Saturday January 22, 2022 @11:53PM (#30043744)
Likewise, I’m 100% not against a pure reverse sear. I just prefer to focus on getting the sides prepped and done, knowing that whenever they’re ready, the meat’s only a few minutes out.