Nobody's saying your fonts should be tiny. I'm saying they should be rendered in high resolution.
I have the same computer and display. I run it at 4k native but nothing is small, no magnifying glass required.
No, when I wrote 'native resolution' I meant 1:1 pixel mapping, which is pretty obvious by context. Nobody has a laptop with a CRT on it these days.
I even don't like my 218ppi displays that much, they are a little fuzzy compared to my 300+ ppi displays.
It's not a matter of opinion what is "low" or "high" when dealing with integers for resolution. It's evident that you think a low-res (by 2022 market options) display is sufficient. That's fine, but it doesn't make it high res.
There are people who think an analog serial console with 24 lines and 80 columns is sufficient resolution for text. That's not what's being discussed: simply the resolution of the display in the computer. It's low by modern laptop standards.
If you don't care about pixels (seems common in PC-land), this is probably a good thing re: power consumption.
I look at text all day, every day, and want it to be high res. It's been high res on my Macs for half a decade, and my XPS is even better. I'll get one of these once they fix the screen.