Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast...
by falcolas on Friday January 21, 2022 @09:19AM
(#30023788)
Well, he launched a car out of spite, so, why not?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast...
by bhhaskin on Friday January 21, 2022 @09:35AM
(#30024004)
They had a rocket they needed to test (Falcon Heavy) and that requires a test payload. Usually test payloads are boring mass analogs. Instead they decided to use something different and get a bunch of marketing out of it. Everything had to be approved by the appropriate government agencies well ahead of time. So where does the "spite" come from?
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast...
by falcolas on Friday January 21, 2022 @10:06AM
(#30024461)
I can't find the reference now, so perhaps I hallucinated it. But as I recall, the car was intended to go to another investor, and the early-Tesla investor/CEO shenanigans put it into limbo, and so Musk launched it.
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast...
by s1artibartfast on Friday January 21, 2022 @12:37PM
(#30026926)
Interesting story if true. Why would Elons personal roadster have been promised to an investor?
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast...
by ben_w on Friday January 21, 2022 @09:32AM
(#30023966)
The alternative was literally a lump of concrete.
That was the Falcon Heavy test launch and he wasn’t able to even give away the flight for free to anyone when he offered.
Re:Starlink satellites hindering detection of near-Earth ast...
by TheCraiggers on Friday January 21, 2022 @09:30AM
(#30023932)
It only happened once, which was an obvious marketing stunt that presumably served its purpose. There's not much benefit to doing it over and over again.
If he was really doing it "for the lulz" then there would be many more such launches. Cars, a painting of some artist that offended him, etc. We haven't seen that though.