Re:Pine64 should re-evaluate their community priorities
by tpxl on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:17PM
(#30015973)
Why doesn't he want to upstream the patches?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pine64 should re-evaluate their community priorities
by seba_dos1 on Friday January 21, 2022 @12:43AM
(#30019631)
AFAIK some things that are (or were, I may not be up-to-date there) present in the megi's tree aren't even upstreamable at all, like the modem power manager driver. When you maintain your own tree, you can be much more liberal in what goes there compared to what mainline maintainers will accept.
Re:Pine64 should re-evaluate their community priorities
by MartijnBraam on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:27PM
(#30016143)
Because it isn't that much work to keep rebasing his tree according to megi.
Re:Pine64 should re-evaluate their community priorities
by zozbot234 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @06:41PM
(#30017060)
Could the pmOS folks get involved and start submitting mainline patches themselves? The Mobian folks might also be interested since they probably want to minimize long-term deviations from Debian, which is based on the mainline.
Re:Pine64 should re-evaluate their community priorities
by MartijnBraam on Thursday January 20, 2022 @06:51PM
(#30017152)
We're working together with the maintainers of various distros now to first of all avoid this mess on the pinephone pro, and then on the longer term fix up pinephone in mainline.