Re:Police in tiny Alabama town suck drivers into legal ‘blac...
by AlbertCory on Thursday January 20, 2022 @03:03PM
(#30013953)
For other examples, look at "administrative costs" at 501(c)(3) organizations, via Charity Navigator.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Police in tiny Alabama town suck drivers into legal ‘blac...
by maratbn on Thursday January 20, 2022 @03:54PM
(#30014814)
501(c)(3) corporations typically do not have armed robbers walking around in public robbing anyone they please.
Re:Police in tiny Alabama town suck drivers into legal ‘blac...
by AlbertCory on Thursday January 20, 2022 @03:59PM
(#30014885)
The comment was specifically about orgs that spend most of their money raising more money.
Re:Police in tiny Alabama town suck drivers into legal ‘blac...
by relaxing on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:29PM
(#30016165)
But it’s not a conflict of interest for a charity to do so.
Re:Police in tiny Alabama town suck drivers into legal ‘blac...
by AlbertCory on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:40PM
(#30016312)
That depends on what you consider a conflict of interest.
Avoiding any actual names: if Charity X advertises itself as a leading way to fight hunger / homelessness / animal abuse / poverty, but 90% of X's budget goes to raising more money, I call that "a conflict of interest." (90% is not a disqualifying amount, by the way.)
As a donor, if you think you're fighting <whatever> but what you're really doing is providing salaries for friends and family of the founders, then you're actually doing something else. What would you call it?