News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Pijul 1.0 Beta. Parent comment

Re:Pijul 1.0 Beta by arbaal on Thursday January 20, 2022 @10:54AM (#30010451)
> Maybe you may also want your tool to serve your workflows and not the opposite.

This sounds like you claim that pijul serves all workflows well, which would contradict my own experience. I'm so used to think in branches / PRs (to display a history and showing lineages), that I find the current way of handling channels/patches of pijul alien. Right now I would need to break my workflow in my daily operation to use pijul.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pijul 1.0 Beta by speed_spread on Friday January 21, 2022 @06:37AM (#30022149)
That was a shot at git, not a claim that pijul supports all workflows.

Anyway, breaking the workflow when switching tools is generally expected. It's a moment to review your assertions.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Pijul 1.0 Beta by pmeunier on Monday January 24, 2022 @07:03AM (#30056599)
You can use branches in Pijul if you want, but you can't use patch commutation in Git.
[ Parent | on HN ]