Re:Shoestring Budget? Starting to feel growth issues on you...
by jshen on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @11:24PM
(#300048)
I like it's well accepted that garbage collection is a huge boon for productivity and stability
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Shoestring Budget? Starting to feel growth issues on you...
by jawngee on Wednesday September 10, 2008 @08:53AM
(#300327)
C has a variety of garbage collectors, here's one:
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/
I wonder if it's really more of an intimidation factor than anything (and I'm not saying this to be a jerk, I am truly curious why people have the perception that C is such a nightmare to maintain).
Re:Shoestring Budget? Starting to feel growth issues on you...
by gnaritas on Wednesday September 10, 2008 @11:41AM
(#300464)
Again, you're looking at best case. Talk to us when GC is mandatory, not optional, because until then, we'll still have to work with C code that can't be trusted because it may not use a GC. To folks who want higher level languages, CG is not an optional feature, it's a core part of the language.
Re:Shoestring Budget? Starting to feel growth issues on you...
by jshen on Wednesday September 10, 2008 @10:53AM
(#300414)
Are you suggesting that you can be as productive in C as I can be in ruby? If not then you answered your own question.
Second, are those garbage collectors widely used in C code and if not why?