Re:Letter from Union Pacific to LA District Attorney re: tra...
by marcellus23 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @12:48PM
(#29997134)
> The data are in, the experiment has been done, and the conclusions are undeniable: it is a complete disaster.
This is no experiment. This is a single case in a single city that may have been avoidable with other policy decisions.
> Anyone who thinks criminals are “good people in bad circumstances” and “having to be a criminal is punishment enough for their crimes” is just wilfully ignorant.
Ah, the real bias comes out now.
> One can’t help but wonder if people pushing these policies are victims of “no-consequences positive parenting” 30 years later. Those policies can work fine in a loving home - not so much in the adversarial and violent world of society at large.
More pseudo psychology please!
Re:Letter from Union Pacific to LA District Attorney re: tra...
by marcellus23 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @09:34AM
(#29994018)
So in other words, you don't have any sources.
Re:Letter from Union Pacific to LA District Attorney re: tra...
by caffeine on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @10:48AM
(#29995136)
TFA is the source
Re:Letter from Union Pacific to LA District Attorney re: tra...
by marcellus23 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @03:39PM
(#30014563)
Nope
Anyone who thinks criminals are “good people in bad circumstances” and “having to be a criminal is punishment enough for their crimes” is just wilfully ignorant.
One can’t help but wonder if people pushing these policies are victims of “no-consequences positive parenting” 30 years later. Those policies can work fine in a loving home - not so much in the adversarial and violent world of society at large.