Re:Direct conversion of CO2 to solid carbon by Gallium-based...
by elzbardico on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @06:02AM
(#29992171)
Why?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Direct conversion of CO2 to solid carbon by Gallium-based...
by dataflow on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @07:41AM
(#29992851)
Why do we need to go carbon-negative? Because the atmosphere already has too much CO2, and reducing net emissions to 0 means that CO2 will stay there. We've emitted that CO2 in the course of (say) 300 years but need to pull it down in (say) < 50 years, hence we need to pull it down much faster than we emitted it.
Not sure if that answered your question or if you meant something else.
Re:Direct conversion of CO2 to solid carbon by Gallium-based...
by elzbardico on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @10:22AM
(#29994746)
Yes, but what I wanted to know is if we kept the current concentrations would temeperature keep rising or would it stay basically the same as it is today.