Re:Shoestring Budget? Starting to feel growth issues on you...
by kingkongrevenge on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @06:33PM
(#299888)
The thing with perl threads is that pretty much nobody uses them. They work fine, as far as I know, but with a default 16MB stack size and "share nothing" semantics don't start more than a few. Perl is more unix centric and people just prefer to fork and use the well baked IPC mechanisms. Various libraries such as POE make fork+IPC easy enough that it's hard to see the need for threads in the kinds of domains where a language like perl is applicable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Shoestring Budget? Starting to feel growth issues on you...
by kaens on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @07:09PM
(#299915)
people just prefer to fork and use the well baked IPC mechanisms
Ahh, that makes sense. I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of perl code runs on *nix systems (I know that with the exception of one app, all the perl I've ever written was only run on linux servers).
Re:Shoestring Budget? Starting to feel growth issues on you...
by zenspider on Wednesday September 10, 2008 @02:57PM
(#300642)
they certainly didn't work fine when I tried to use them... after they'd gone into production releases of perl, the canonical demo/example scripts that were out there all crashed the perl runtime in a fiery horrible death.
I can only hope that it has improved since then, but I've moved on to greener pastures.
Re:Shoestring Budget? Starting to feel growth issues on you...
by kingkongrevenge on Wednesday September 10, 2008 @03:35PM
(#300678)
They were clearly marked as experimental in the documentation all the way up to recent 5.8 releases. From what I hear they work fine now.