How A.I. Conquered Poker

Re:How A.I. Conquered Poker by throwaway_Aef8 on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @08:29PM (#29988703)

IIRC it's "solved" for heads up but not really multiway like 3+ to the flop. I believe in a recent Bart Hanson Youtube he points out that mutltiway is not solved.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How A.I. Conquered Poker by throwaway_Aef8 on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @08:31PM (#29988718)

oh wait, Google showed me this:

> Machines have raised the stakes once again. A superhuman poker-playing bot called Pluribus has beaten top human professionals at six-player no-limit Texas hold’em poker, the most popular variant of the game. It is the first time that an artificial-intelligence (AI) program has beaten elite human players at a game with more than two players

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02156-9#ref-CR1

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How A.I. Conquered Poker by jeffreyrogers on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @09:17PM (#29989070)

It's not solved for multiway in the sense that the optimal move in each situation isn't known, but there are AIs like Pluribus that have superhuman performance.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How A.I. Conquered Poker by garbagetime on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @10:04PM (#29989420)

Superhuman performance in a very constrained version of no-limit hold'em

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How A.I. Conquered Poker by jeffreyrogers on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @10:29PM (#29989605)

Those constraints don't seem that strong to me. The algorithm could've just been retrained with different stack sizes if it ended up making a big enough difference.

[ Parent | on HN ]