A counter example, the package of Cheezits says "made with 100% real cheese", even though they are not 100% cheese, cheese is the 3rd ingredient, below flour and oil, but of the cheese used in the product, it's 100% real cheese. (so it makes it a meaningless statement, I guess they mean "no artificial cheese flavoring")
If the car can't "fully" self drive, then it shouldn't be marketed as such. Call it "partially self driving", "assisted self driving" or whatever.
"To guide, control, or direct (a vehicle)."
My car has driver assistance features, it can do basic lane keeping, keep a set distance behind the car in front (even in stop and go traffic), and has emergency braking assistance. But no one would say that it's self-driving.
Tesla FSD can control the car from entering the highway to taking your exit (plus some support for driving on smaller streets).
But it's not autonomous, hands-free driving.
Taking the dictionary definition of fully:
"completely or entirely; to the fullest extent"
I would expect a fully self-driving car to drive for the entirety of any trip I wish to take. Anything less than that I would consider as "partial".
My car has limited self-driving, it can only do limited lane keeping or keeping distance from the car in front.
By that definition self-parking cars can also fully self-drive.
My definition of driving is being able to do all the tasks required to pass a driving test, i.e. driving around a city (intersections, roundabouts etc.), motorway, country road and car parks.
Made with 100% real cheese
Is clearly and unambiguously not the same as
100% cheese
But it is quite a good example:
A cheesit contains an ingredient that is 100% cheese.
A Tesla with FSD mode, is a car that has a feature that is full self driving.
If that mode cannot handle all conditions, then it is not full self driving. That means no “I’m confused” switch to a human driver.