News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JavaScript is Not Web Assembly by mvzink on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @06:40PM (#2998144)
I'm bothered by these bits:

Mr. Schlueter writes "you don’t compile it to target a given platform," as if this would be an advantage or a justification for existing ... when it's really quite the opposite.

I don't know when "order of magnitude difference" became a synonym for "worthwhile difference"

I didn't see Schlueter arguing either of these things, but we may have read the post differently. Both points, in my view, seemed only to illustrate that the JS-Assembly analogy is wrong, not to argue against to-JS languages.

Re:JavaScript is Not Web Assembly by jashkenas on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @07:38PM (#2998288)
Regarding #1, you may very well be right, and I've just been reading through "language-wank" goggles. But regarding #2:

https://twitter.com/#!/izs/status/114089739908415488

And to be extra clear, I appreciate the post, and agree with most of it.

Re:JavaScript is Not Web Assembly by mvzink on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @11:07PM (#2998755)
Okay, I'll give you #2 after that. And I'll point out that asking for a 10:1 difference in expressiveness from JS is, let's face it, ridiculous. (Except in specialized domain applications perhaps.)