Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w...
by amyjess on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:18AM
(#29975761)
> whether they'd be eligible to be re-hired
"Bob isn't eligible for rehire. Wait, I think the line cut out a bit there, I said Bob isn't eligible for rehire. Just wanted to make sure you got that: Bob is not eligible for rehire, no way, no how, nosirree."
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w...
by eru on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:33AM
(#29975857)
Keep in mind: the judges that interpret the law are humans, not computers.
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w...
by etchalon on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:09PM
(#29983190)
I try not to even have a "tone" when I saw that. Completely neutral. No implications.
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w...
by CheezeIt on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @12:54AM
(#29975628)
Will they give you a magnitude attached to those liabilities? Anybody can falsely sue for defamation, so you need an average cost value beyond the mere possibility of lawsuit to get a true representation of the problem.
Any HR person / lawyer will tell you providing a negative review of an employee, let alone with amount of detail, opens you up to liabilities that aren't worth it.
As an employer, I've been told that, if called, I should only provide the date a person started with the company, the date a person left, their starting and ending salaries (murky now given salary history laws) and whether they'd be eligible to be re-hired.
I ask any employee we fire for cause not to list us as a reference.