Re:Reasonable Anger In Europe Over Ridiculous Copyright Exte...
by nokcha on Wednesday September 14, 2011 @02:23PM
(#2997320)
>... the creator would have a limited right of refusal for e.g. political or pornographic derivative works...
A law that explicitly discriminates against political works would likely violate the First Amendment. See, e.g., R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992), holding that content-based regulations are presumptively invalid.
A law that explicitly discriminates against political works would likely violate the First Amendment. See, e.g., R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992), holding that content-based regulations are presumptively invalid.