The SNESticle Liberation Project

Re:The SNESticle Liberation Project by Wowfunhappy on Monday January 17, 2022 @06:05PM (#29972740)

Perhaps I phrased that poorly. It's not Satoshi's wealth that matters, but rather the source of his income—he became rich from his invention. I believe that should open him up to scrutiny, for the same reason that publishing investment advice should open you up to more scrutiny than publishing sports trivia.

(I don't want to imply that Satoshi did anything untoward, because I don't think he did. However, it's a valid thing to want to investigate.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The SNESticle Liberation Project by sine_reality on Monday January 17, 2022 @10:51PM (#29974865)

Still phrased pretty poorly in my opinion. You've sort of just reworded your original comment with some additional assertions that don't really make any sense. How is the individual(s) in question and their hard work that they've decided to unleash free of charge for anyone to use as they see fit even a little bit close to publishing investment advice? Your argument really comes off as being envious in some way or otherwise bitter.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The SNESticle Liberation Project by csdvrx on Monday January 17, 2022 @09:06PM (#29974107)

No, it's still not a valid reason to investigate someone who's made it very clear they do not want any scrutiny.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The SNESticle Liberation Project by misterprime on Monday January 17, 2022 @07:16PM (#29973258)

What's to investigate? Are you upset about potential tax fraud or something?

[ Parent | on HN ]