Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for Covid-19 (Peer-Reviewed)

Re:Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for Covid-19 (Peer-Reviewed) by coding123 on Saturday January 15, 2022 @03:00PM (#29949655)

Well, I don't think HN will ban accounts for that. They ban accounts for being mean or starting flamewars. Being republican is NOT a reason for bans here.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for Covid-19 (Peer-Reviewed) by hunter2_ on Saturday January 15, 2022 @03:07PM (#29949726)

Genuinely curious why alignment with this drug is so republican. Seems like the kind of thing that ought to be bipartisan if it's arguably progressive.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for Covid-19 (Peer-Reviewed) by dekhn on Sunday January 16, 2022 @11:23AM (#29957267)

the alignment is not "republican", it's "ignorant". my relatives who are well educated doctors ("we voted for trump because taxes") don't believe this; they got vaccinated (and kept their mouths shut about it) like the majority of other well-off republicans.

[ Parent | on HN ]

[dead]

Re:Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for Covid-19 (Peer-Reviewed) by mullingitover on Saturday January 15, 2022 @03:13PM (#29949783)

What ideas in particular have you found are unfairly flagged to oblivion on HN?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for Covid-19 (Peer-Reviewed) by supperburg on Saturday January 15, 2022 @03:20PM (#29949862)

Why should I tell you when it would be flagged immediately and nobody would see it anyway?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for Covid-19 (Peer-Reviewed) by mullingitover on Saturday January 15, 2022 @03:24PM (#29949892)

Something tells me that these ideas aren't legitimately debatable conservative ideas.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for Covid-19 (Peer-Reviewed) by coding123 on Saturday January 15, 2022 @03:11PM (#29949765)

I post republican views all the time and have been moderated very rarely.

[ Parent | on HN ]