Re:Hate leap seconds? Imagine a negative one
by kuschku on Saturday January 15, 2022 @09:26AM
(#29946578)
> This just means the "length of a second" wanders around randomly and is thus useless
Why would it? My redefinition just means the length of a second is defined as a given number of cycles of caesium in a gravitational field equivalent to that of Greenwich.
If you're in a different gravitational field, you'll just have to convert the values easily.
Why would it? My redefinition just means the length of a second is defined as a given number of cycles of caesium in a gravitational field equivalent to that of Greenwich.
If you're in a different gravitational field, you'll just have to convert the values easily.