Re:More than 1M fewer students are in college, the lowest nu...
by endisneigh on Friday January 14, 2022 @10:14AM
(#29935418)
Lol ok - so you got nothing. A shame I was interested in reading. Thanks for clarifying.
Re:More than 1M fewer students are in college, the lowest nu...
by randomdata on Friday January 14, 2022 @10:47AM
(#29935873)
I do not have URLs memorized, no. If you are legitimately interested in reading, you can easily find what you are looking for on Google, I'm sure.
Re:More than 1M fewer students are in college, the lowest nu...
by endisneigh on Friday January 14, 2022 @11:03AM
(#29936121)
No time to waste looking up claims other people made unfortunately - especially when I don’t believe then to begin with. Good luck.
Feel free to find the link for me and edit the post though if it’s legit.
Re:More than 1M fewer students are in college, the lowest nu...
by randomdata on Friday January 14, 2022 @11:21AM
(#29936390)
Should I be concerned that you don't believe me? You've mentioned that a couple of times. I guess I'm not clear on what value you are trying to add to the discussion.
Like, you want me to link to it? I wouldn't know the URL off the top of my head. That is an oddly specific thing to memorize.
> Something tells me you won’t show any that supports the quoted assertion.
No doubt. You can tell someone is just looking for a fake argument when they start asking for someone to have memorized an arbitrary URL that is likely a deep path structure and not reasonably memorizable.
> By the way the quoted assertion has nothing to do with income stagnation.
Especially when they think they have it all figured out, free of misinterpretation. The intent of what I said has everything to do with income stagnation. If you have interpreted it differently, I'm not sure what to tell ya.