Re:More than 1M fewer students are in college, the lowest nu...
by seibelj on Thursday January 13, 2022 @12:39PM
(#29923847)
On a related note - who in their right mind thinks donating to their college is a good decision? I don't understand why rich people keep donating buildings rather than donating parks to their communities. When I begin to donate money for serious, colleges are getting exactly $0. The money will go to places and people that actually need it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:More than 1M fewer students are in college, the lowest nu...
by pbhjpbhj on Thursday January 13, 2022 @01:01PM
(#29924193)
When you have an organisation full of people creating worth that you can cream off, you've bought a few houses, yacht, fast cars. You get to a point where you realise you're not leaving anything of value behind and think "if I pay for a university building then I've created a legacy of education for generations to come".
TL;DR it's like a shiny name plaque for billionaires.
Re:More than 1M fewer students are in college, the lowest nu...
by seibelj on Thursday January 13, 2022 @01:11PM
(#29924327)
I get it - and I agree with the reasoning - but I want to leave a shiny new park with my name on the plaque, not a building in an overpriced university.
Re:More than 1M fewer students are in college, the lowest nu...
by chii on Thursday January 13, 2022 @11:55PM
(#29930718)
Very few people would see the park compared to the University building.
Re:More than 1M fewer students are in college, the lowest nu...
by seibelj on Friday January 14, 2022 @10:10AM
(#29935366)
I disagree - more people would see and use the park. The building is for a rarified group.
Re:More than 1M fewer students are in college, the lowest nu...
by manquer on Friday January 14, 2022 @02:33PM
(#29939207)
Depends on whose respect you value more. The average park goer or the people who work/study at the University.
Also such donations kind of guarantee your kids will get into the university, so some additional perks are there too