News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Peter Thiel: Best Predictor of Startup Success Is Low CEO... by boredguy8 on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @03:34AM (#299186)
Is there a difference between a "startup" and "starting a company"?

I ask because, "In Startupland, everybody should be working towards the same goal: that big juicy exit," couldn't be further from my mind. I know what that means to me (as does my team) in terms of access to venture funding, but I'm not particularly interested in an "exit". I want to build a service that's beneficial and worth paying for and that is responsive to my customer's needs.

Am I missing something, or do I need to change how I think about what I'm doing?

Re:Peter Thiel: Best Predictor of Startup Success Is Low CEO... by ojbyrne on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @07:21AM (#299292)
That's TechCrunch editorializing - they're all about publicizing big exits. It makes for more page views.
Re:Peter Thiel: Best Predictor of Startup Success Is Low CEO... by alaskamiller on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @03:44AM (#299192)
startups => exits

company => provides services and products

Re:Peter Thiel: Best Predictor of Startup Success Is Low CEO... by jon_dahl on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @10:33AM (#299426)
Why not startup => company => provides services and products => exit?
Re:Peter Thiel: Best Predictor of Startup Success Is Low CEO... by axod on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @12:37PM (#299557)
Well one reason would be that the startup needs to be bought by someone in the right position to exploit it before it can become profitable.

So in that case, you could create a startup that in itself cannot be profitable, but when purchased by a larger company can become wildly profitable for them.

I don't think that's an unusual case.

Re:Peter Thiel: Best Predictor of Startup Success Is Low CEO... by fallentimes on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @07:09AM (#299279)
haha which is why all companies were startups at some point but not all startups will be companies.